| Author |
Message |
     hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 339
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Monday, July 16, 2007 - 08:54 am: |  
|
|
peterloh
Member
Username: peterloh
Post Number: 2767
Registered: 03-2003Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Monday, July 16, 2007 - 09:04 am: |
|
Hi David,
Is this the shares that you identify to perform, that we spoke about?
Best Wishes,
Peter
-------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Please note that comments made in this column is mainly for the interpretation of charts in technical analysis. It is not made in my professional capacity and should not be taken as advice.In my professional capacity I am only allowed to give advice on certain managed funds authorised by my license dealer.Any share discuss is for general interest and should not be relied on to make an investment decision.It is likely that I may own the shares that we discussed as a trade or as an investment. Please consult your stock broker or financial adviser in regard to your personal situation.
The views expressed here contain information derived from public available sources that has not been independently verified.No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.Any forward looking information in this representation has been prepared on the basis of a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect.It should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by the writer.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 340
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Monday, July 16, 2007 - 09:26 am: |
|
Is this the shares that you identify to perform
This is an experimentation thread. I am testing out some traits I've learned here
http://www.incrediblecharts.com/userscripts/forums/show.plx?tpc=10&post=115266#P OST115266
and trying to apply them. In this experiment, I am focusing on trying to pick out a portfolio that consistently performs.
I am positive that the first portfolio will have positive gains by the end of the week. The other two are comparative portfolios.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
peterloh
Member
Username: peterloh
Post Number: 2768
Registered: 03-2003Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Monday, July 16, 2007 - 10:42 am: |
|
Looking forward to your test results.
-------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Please note that comments made in this column is mainly for the interpretation of charts in technical analysis. It is not made in my professional capacity and should not be taken as advice.In my professional capacity I am only allowed to give advice on certain managed funds authorised by my license dealer.Any share discuss is for general interest and should not be relied on to make an investment decision.It is likely that I may own the shares that we discussed as a trade or as an investment. Please consult your stock broker or financial adviser in regard to your personal situation.
The views expressed here contain information derived from public available sources that has not been independently verified.No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.Any forward looking information in this representation has been prepared on the basis of a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect.It should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by the writer.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 345
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Saturday, July 21, 2007 - 06:47 pm: |
|
Here are the results
Here are the stocks in order of % increase
For this week, the weekly increase for XAO was 0.66%.
MOL is ranked #6 for highest 1M % increase.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 347
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Saturday, July 21, 2007 - 07:35 pm: |
|
Hmm, second experiment -
I will track these and see what happens.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 348
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Tuesday, July 31, 2007 - 10:20 pm: |
|
results
Here are the charts that were the winners
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 349
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Thursday, October 25, 2007 - 01:19 pm: |
|
been busy with stuff.
Here is a watchlist in retrospect.
Mixed results so far.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 350
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Monday, October 29, 2007 - 02:52 pm: |
|
Here's another list I produced on Thursday last week.
Let's see if it can make it into the greens.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 352
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 07:37 am: |
|
I entered the wrong number for LEG. Red's down to 6.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
ohkoolnutz
Member
Username: ohkoolnutz
Post Number: 674
Registered: 10-2005
Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 08:20 am: |
|
Does it become clear to you?
Stocks that rise will rise. Stocks that fall will fall.
Stocks that fell will rise. Stocks that rose will fall.
The greater your diversification the more average your returns.
The longer you hold a stock the more average your return.
If you can predict shorter-term swings (including entry and exit at the right time) you can outperform average returns. If you can't you are best to dollar-cost average into a low-cost fund and use your time in other ways.
---
ohk
Lies, Damn Lies and Technical Analysis
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 353
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 10:37 am: |
|
Stocks that rise will rise. Stocks that fall will fall.
Sure, by all means. There is no disagreement on this part.
"Stocks that fell will rise. Stocks that rose will fall."
By definition, that has to happen right? if its fallen, then you're denoting that its reached it bottom.
The greater your diversification the more average your returns.
It is true that the more diverse the profile is, the harder it is to get the highest return. However, I would probably say that the greater the diversification, the less variance your returns are likely to be. This all depends though on how consistent your picks are.
If you're consistently picking ones that are scoring +10%, then most likely your average will stick around there.
This quote does not take compounding into account either.
If you can predict shorter-term swings (including entry and exit at the right time) you can outperform average returns.
Humans cannot be 100% sure what tomorrow's weather would be like tomorrow. How much more so the weather conditions of the stock market. My aim in the whole thread is to be able to differentiate between ones that are potentially strong stocks.
Strong stocks do not already have to be at its peak. Take for instance an athlete - It is not until the gun goes off that he races to the finish line to finish first. An athelete needs to be fit though in order to do this. Likewise, stocks that are strong will eventually run to the peak. Identifying the 'fitness' of the stock is what I am trying to do.
I do not want to 'guess' how fit the athlete is - I just want to know that its fit.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
hibikijoji
Member
Username: hibikijoji
Post Number: 354
Registered: 08-2005Rating: N/A
Votes: 0
|
| | Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 10:41 am: |
|
Now its down to 5.
Disclaimer :
The views expressed here are for experimental practices only. They have not been independently verified. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information.
Please consult your broker or financial adviser before making an investment decision.
|
|
