Thank you so much IC!

Chart Forum » Feedback » Thank you so much IC!

«« Previous Next »»

Thread Start New Thread
Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post

Author

Message

hibikijoji

Member

Post Number: 1
Registered: 08-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Thursday, August 04, 2005 - 02:06 pm:

I am amazed at the amount of valuable information here. I'm new in the trading scene, and so the basics proved to be great!

Using some of the maths listed on the site (and some of my own), I've been able to work out a way to earn 30-60%+ return with most companies...and this is just from historic data too!

Thanks again, I will certainly refer this site to others.

davkell

Member

Post Number: 178
Registered: 07-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Thursday, August 04, 2005 - 06:46 pm:

Yea, 30-60% most companies..... prey tell?

"Trade Your Way To Financial Freedom" - Van K Tharp

hibikijoji

Member

Post Number: 2
Registered: 08-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Monday, August 08, 2005 - 09:48 am:

As I mentioned before, all of the information can be worked out by using the information on this site :-)

Hint: Trading secret's + Dow theory (bear and bull trends) really helped.

ann

Member

Post Number: 683
Registered: 04-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Monday, August 08, 2005 - 04:15 pm:

Hi Hibikijoji,

Hind sight, paper trading and a bull market can really show you how to make a fortune.

Then there is the real world!!!

All jokes aside, welcome and may all your trades be successful ones. It is more fun that way. Even if you lose money from a trade, you can turn it into a winning trade by learning from it. Just call it tuition fees!

Cheers
Ann

moss

Member

Post Number: 1
Registered: 09-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Tuesday, September 13, 2005 - 01:08 am:

Hello:
The charts and indicators are excellent. For a greater appreciation of these indicators and MAs, I would like to see actual numbers appear as the cross hairs move. Thank you. Please see the example below:
MA10 = 34.97 %K = 34.97 %D = 26 V = 3,500 +DI:12
-DI:40 ADX:48 %R =45 RSI = 22

moss

colin_twiggs

Member

Post Number: 2049
Registered: 09-2002

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Tuesday, September 13, 2005 - 11:03 am:

Moss,
Thanks for the suggestion. Our development plans include adding current indicator values to the legend. I will ask them whether this can be dynamic (change with the crosshairs).

Regards,
Colin

dug

Member

Post Number: 438
Registered: 07-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Friday, October 14, 2005 - 10:29 am:

Chuck's gone "Tawdry" down in General/Ramp School/BLRrr Black rages;
Again.
As the post seems repetive of a singular thought,basically nahdenah schoolboy rot,can it please be edited?
Happy Trading,tho..
jr

Dig for it.

kate

Member

Post Number: 184
Registered: 04-2005

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Friday, October 21, 2005 - 09:02 pm:

Dear Colin,

Regarding your worries about Arthur Gibson, is there any way you can inform new members of the huge variety of colourful personalities we have on the forum and include a trader's "health warning"?

Regards
Kate

elisabeth

Member

Post Number: 215
Registered: 09-2002

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Friday, October 21, 2005 - 09:31 pm:

Kate, seconded.

Colin, perhaps this could be a condition of joining the forum - ie "be aware that people express opinions which are theirs entirely - you should always do you own research".

I understand your concern for the inexperienced, but from my perspective, and though I am mostly quietly enjoying it all in the background, people should understand and accept the diverse personalities who are part of this forum.

Though I can't relate in any way to Arthur G's way of pushing the button at his broker website (gosh, I wish I was in his position!), I do appreciate his "letting it all hang out" so to speak - see, I have those same swings from "hey it's going up" to "hey it's going down" at my miniscule level and it's comforting to know a bigger player suffers the same.

Regards,
Elisabeth

holycow

Member

Post Number: 1949
Registered: 08-2004

Rating:
Votes: 2


Friday, October 21, 2005 - 10:18 pm:

Colin,

Have you heard of the three strikes rule? Instead of a straight ban imposition, how about something like this:

1) first warning - sin bin 3 days;

2) 2nd warning - sin bin 1 week;

3) 3rd warning - 3 strikes - it's a red card - out!

I think for some one new as AG, he should be given some leeway for his "foul".

Cheers.

HC

"... if you've got a chart, I have an opinion!"

lazarus

Member

Post Number: 22
Registered: 11-2003

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 09:49 pm:

Fully endorse Holycows sentiments. Regards Lazarus

rederob

Member

Post Number: 1644
Registered: 10-2002

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 11:36 pm:

your holiness HC

Mucking things up again!

On the third strike the player is "out".
There are no penalties for the first two "strikes".

Umpires and referees in some sports carry three cards:
The green card (circular) is a warning, without penalty.
The yellow card (square) is a warning AND a penalty (time out of play) but a return to play is allowed.
The red card (triangular) is immediate suspension from play for the remainder of the game, and mandatory reporting for further action.
The 3 cards can be given in any order, depending on the nature of the offence.
Some sports have automatic escalations, for example a second yellow card can mean immediate suspension, although the offence would not of itself have rated a red card.
Perhaps what this forum needs AFTER an immediate penalty of suspension is an agreed period of time for the 5 moderators to reach consensus on the poster's fate. I recall ANN and dug (aka jr and citizen) being hung out to dry for yonks before promising to tow the party line, or whatever they agreed, before returning to the fold.
Others have connived re-entry below the radar and remained (or still are) undetected - such being the marvels of technology.
I don't know what the 5 chosen moderators are doing about Mr Gibson - maybe nothing, maybe a lot.
I don't know what Mr Gibson knows about the duration of his suspension, or how or if it will be resolved - are there "rules" of disengagement?

Having read Colin's thoughts on a range of worldly topics, such as about Aung San Suu Kyi, Zimbabwe, Guantanamo detainees I thought he may have had a less restrictive view on what constitutes a danger to others.
Am I wrong?

holycow

Member

Post Number: 1962
Registered: 08-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Sunday, October 23, 2005 - 10:07 am:

Rederob,

This is my last response.

You are unnecessarily complicating the issue, close to being petty. If you want result, KISS will achieve it. It's bad form to relate Colin's world view to the need of running a biz/forum such as this. If I were to put you in his position, I have a feeling you will come out lesser. Pragmatism is not your forte I can see. Hope this is not too "personal".

Have a good day.

HC

"... if you've got a chart, I have an opinion!"

msparks

Member

Post Number: 235
Registered: 10-2004

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0


Sunday, October 23, 2005 - 10:21 am:

What did the big punter AG do anyway.

Surely noone took seriously his waffle.
(apart from recruiting a following like the Pied Piper)

Why don't you get back to the resources where you belong Redernob and stop talking all this crap.
Or at least have a look at Sally Malley and tell me why i should be buying now ?

HC's rules sound OK except the suspensions are too short to mean much to so many for so few a moment in t